Post by xyz3800 on Feb 28, 2024 5:56:16 GMT
The BNDES CPI, from the Chamber of Deputies, will request the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba access to the records of Odebrecht's leniency agreement with the Federal Public Ministry. The process documents have been kept confidential by the court, but they describe how the part of the money sent to Brazil will be paid. The CPI authorized this Tuesday (16/4) a request from deputy Jorge Solla (PT-BA). Gustavo Lima/Chamber of Deputies CPI authorizes request from deputy Jorge Solla to have access to records of Odebrecht's leniency agreement with MPF Gustavo Lima/Chamber of Deputies The agreement provides for the money to remain in an account administered by the 13th Court, but at the disposal of the “lava jet” prosecutors, as revealed in a report by ConJur . But “appendix 5” of the agreement, which outlines the payment schedule and how the money will be distributed, is under wraps.
The payment was agreed upon in an agreement between Odebrecht and the United States Department of Justice and the Swiss Attorney General's Office. It was agreed that 82% of the money would be allocated to “Brazilian authorities”, and the rest would be divided between the USA and Switzerland. But the Brazilian chapter of the agreement foresees the sending of R$6.2 billion to the MPF. Jorge Solla had already asked for an investigation to be Exit Mobile Number List opened to determine the fate of the money. According to the legal cooperation agreement between Brazil and the USA, the competent authority for the relationship with the DoJ would be the Ministry of Justice. And the money should have gone to a Treasury account, not the Federal Court. In the request to the CPI, the deputy states that the 13th Federal Court must grant access to the documents, so that it is known where the money went. Solla cites a Veja report according to which Odebrecht received 81.8% of the entire volume of money lent by BNDES for infrastructure works.
The report in question also provides clarifying information: AIR aims to guarantee the efficiency of the proposed regulation in achieving the public policy subject to regulation, ensuring that its benefits are greater than the total costs; “benefits” and “total costs” must be considered in their quantitative and qualitative dimensions, so that consumers, regulated agents, the regulatory agency and society benefit; alternative solutions, non-regulatory solutions and the option of not acting by public authorities must also be considered in the RIA.The companies were notified by the Federal Court and are also prohibited from entering into new amendments to contracts. TRF-4 determines that concessionaires investigated by "lava-jato" reduce toll fees in Paraná.
The payment was agreed upon in an agreement between Odebrecht and the United States Department of Justice and the Swiss Attorney General's Office. It was agreed that 82% of the money would be allocated to “Brazilian authorities”, and the rest would be divided between the USA and Switzerland. But the Brazilian chapter of the agreement foresees the sending of R$6.2 billion to the MPF. Jorge Solla had already asked for an investigation to be Exit Mobile Number List opened to determine the fate of the money. According to the legal cooperation agreement between Brazil and the USA, the competent authority for the relationship with the DoJ would be the Ministry of Justice. And the money should have gone to a Treasury account, not the Federal Court. In the request to the CPI, the deputy states that the 13th Federal Court must grant access to the documents, so that it is known where the money went. Solla cites a Veja report according to which Odebrecht received 81.8% of the entire volume of money lent by BNDES for infrastructure works.
The report in question also provides clarifying information: AIR aims to guarantee the efficiency of the proposed regulation in achieving the public policy subject to regulation, ensuring that its benefits are greater than the total costs; “benefits” and “total costs” must be considered in their quantitative and qualitative dimensions, so that consumers, regulated agents, the regulatory agency and society benefit; alternative solutions, non-regulatory solutions and the option of not acting by public authorities must also be considered in the RIA.The companies were notified by the Federal Court and are also prohibited from entering into new amendments to contracts. TRF-4 determines that concessionaires investigated by "lava-jato" reduce toll fees in Paraná.